OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 






Az Senate Bill 1113..
 Moderated by: jpierce  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
ixtow
Founder's Club Member
 

Joined: Sat Nov 25th, 2006
Location: The Swamp, Florida USA
Posts: 1574
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 11:29 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Sonora Rebel wrote: Just enter any bar and pull a 'Jedi' on the barkeep.  "You do not see a gun.  There's no gun here.  I am free to imbibe... " 

Seriously... how many (especially woman) who CC more so than men in AZ... have complied with this already? How many people who CC have ever complied at all?  Then... there certain states where even a 'CC" permit is rarer than a Blue Unicorn... and women (especially) will CC somethin' for their own defense... regardless of what a bunch'a milque-toast, candyassed, hoplophobic control freaks in the gummint (State or local) decree otherwise.

This is just 'something on paper'... whereas the actual dynamic has been something 'people do' anyway for years.  'Think politicians are cognizant of actualities? Not on this planet.

1) I am quite sure that politicians are cognizant, they just have other plans...

2) I've never met a woman who DIDN'T carry a concealed weapon of some kind.  They, more than most, understand the need to bear arms.  They simply choose to carry an ineffective weapon to 'feel' safe instead of 'be' safe.  "steak knife in the purse" being the most common useless 'feel good' weapon I've found them to have.

TOF
Regular Member


Joined: Sun Nov 2nd, 2008
Location: Happy Jack, Arizona USA
Posts: 185
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jun 12th, 2009 11:47 pm
 Quote  Reply 
So what are the rules in your location Count.

It is not necessary to go through the NRA to address your Senators or Congress person, state or national. The following link gets you to State Legislators. Click on Senate or House then click on members and you will have contact data for all members.

http://www.azleg.gov/

Write them now as the votes are coming up very soon.
I am not going to muddy the waters I have asked all of them to support the pertinent bills. If they must compromise a little till next year I can live with it. I am convinced we are making progress in Arizona. We are certainly doing better than many states.

 

Stay safe

Notso
Activist Member
 

Joined: Sun May 13th, 2007
Location: Laveen, Arizona USA
Posts: 284
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 06:01 pm
 Quote  Reply 
SB1113 was just defeated in the Senate vote, but apparently can be reconsidered again for another vote.

Sonora Rebel
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Aug 6th, 2008
Location: Picture Rocks, Arizona USA
Posts: 2577
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 06:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Well... that sucks! Kommiefornian influence strikes again. :cuss:

ccwinstructor
Centurion Member
 

Joined: Fri Jul 11th, 2008
Location: Yuma, Arizona USA
Posts: 121
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 06:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Notso wrote: SB1113 was just defeated in the Senate vote, but apparently can be reconsidered again for another vote.
Nasty.  Last year it passed with nearly 2/3rds of the vote!

Notso
Activist Member
 

Joined: Sun May 13th, 2007
Location: Laveen, Arizona USA
Posts: 284
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 07:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The reasons the anti's gave was just bizarre. One said 'My cousin was in a fight in a bar and got shot and killed - I vote no'. That had a lot to do with this. Some people have no ability to think logically.

Crossfire Jedi
Regular Member


Joined: Fri Jan 16th, 2009
Location: Chandler, Arizona USA
Posts: 228
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 07:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The Senate continues with its accelerated schedule and voted on SB 1113 (Restaurant Carry) and SB 1243 (Defensive Display) in today's (June 15, 2009) Third Read after passing them out of the Senate Committee of the Whole (COW) just last Friday (June 12, 2009).

Unfortunately, SB 1113, which limited the carrying of concealed weapons in certain restaurants serving alcohol to CCW permit holders, providing signs are not posted forbidding firearms and the person possessing the firearm does not consume alcohol, failed by a tie vote of 14-14 with two Senators not voting.  One of the Senators not voting was Republican Senator John Nelson, a supporter of SB 1113, who was unable to be at this session due to a family emergency.  Unfortunately, a number of Senators who indicated to AzCDL that they supported SB 1113 voted against it on the Senate Floor.  However, there is still hope for SB 1113.  Senator Harper, the sponsor of SB 1113, seeing how the vote was going, switched his vote to "Nay" to create the tie vote.  This will enable Senator Harper to ask for a reconsideration vote so that SB 1113 can be voted on again in an upcoming Third Read, probably tomorrow, June 16, 2009.  You can see how each Senator voted here:  http://tinyurl.com/SB1113Senate3rd .

SB 1243, the AzCDL-requested bill that clarifies when a defensive display is justified, sailed through today's Senate Third Read by a vote of 21-7 with 2 not voting.  Vote details are here: http://tinyurl.com/SB1243Senate3rd .  From here, SB 1243 will be transmitted to the House where the process starts all over again.

Stay tuned!  When critical legislation moves, we will notify you via these Alerts.

These alerts are a project of the Arizona Citizens Defense League (AzCDL), an all volunteer, non-profit, non-partisan grassroots organization.  Join today! 

AzCDL – Protecting Your Freedom
http://www.azcdl.org/html/join_us_.html

ixtow
Founder's Club Member
 

Joined: Sat Nov 25th, 2006
Location: The Swamp, Florida USA
Posts: 1574
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 07:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Notso wrote: The reasons the anti's gave was just bizarre. One said 'My cousin was in a fight in a bar and got shot and killed - I vote no'. That had a lot to do with this. Some people have no ability to think logically.
Why was no one there to debunk it?

If possessing a gun meant that a person was in a violent state of mind, there would be millions of 'gun deaths' every day.  The population of the country would be cut in half by the end of the week.

Notso
Activist Member
 

Joined: Sun May 13th, 2007
Location: Laveen, Arizona USA
Posts: 284
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 15th, 2009 11:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
As the vote was being taken, each Senator could speak for or against the bill. I think the time for debate was over. I wanted to just reach out and slap someone everytime I heard an emotional plea to not pass that bill. Another Senator just kept saying that 'guns and alcohol don't mix' regardless of the fact that gun carriers won't be allowed to drink. Grrrrr, just pisses me off. I can imagine what the sponsors of the bill felt like.

TOF
Regular Member


Joined: Sun Nov 2nd, 2008
Location: Happy Jack, Arizona USA
Posts: 185
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 12:17 am
 Quote  Reply 
It's not over yet. We have some good people working for passage. Senator Harper will if possible have his ducks lined up better when he calls for reconsideration.

I am quite certain they will be talking to some of the nay votes in an attempt to shift the vote our way.

AZkopper
Regular Member


Joined: Fri Jun 20th, 2008
Location: Prescott, Arizona USA
Posts: 373
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 06:14 am
 Quote  Reply 
Thank God my new Senator, Steven Pierce, voted Yes.

I hope the next vote goes better.

Notso
Activist Member
 

Joined: Sun May 13th, 2007
Location: Laveen, Arizona USA
Posts: 284
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 10:26 pm
 Quote  Reply 
SB1113 passed out of the Senate today. Now, on to the House. I understand it will move quickly through there and to a vote.

GWbiker
Regular Member


Joined: Fri Mar 21st, 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona USA
Posts: 449
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 16th, 2009 10:49 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Notso wrote: SB1113 passed out of the Senate today. Now, on to the House. I understand it will move quickly through there and to a vote.
Vote was 18-10-2. The usual liberal minded suspects voted against SB1113.

Dahwg
Regular Member


Joined: Fri Feb 22nd, 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona USA
Posts: 437
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Wed Jun 17th, 2009 12:30 am
 Quote  Reply 
Notso wrote: SB1113 passed out of the Senate today. Now, on to the House. I understand it will move quickly through there and to a vote.

The Arizona Red Star will be none too pleased about it. HA! Can't wait to read the letters to the Editor... WAAAAHHHH

 

:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate

 

chesphoto
Regular Member
 

Joined: Thu Jan 1st, 2009
Location: Phoenix, Arizona USA
Posts: 44
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 05:22 am
 Quote  Reply 
My Senator, Jim Waring voted to pass the bill.  He has been great, constantly updating me on the votes.

I just wrote to my representatives to ask them to support the two senate bills.

I also wrote the Senate Judiciary Committee to pass the bill to allow law abiding citizens to carry concealed.  I have my ccw permit, but I would like to have more law abiding citizens carrying.  The more carrying, the safer I am.

I have lived in Arizona since 1980 and have never contacted a state official.  Now that have a gun, (12/08) I have become an activist!  :celebrate:celebrate:celebrate

We have a real chance to get some great laws passed, but we need to be vocal.  Contact you representatives now!

Count
Founder's Club Member
 

Joined: Fri Mar 9th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 266
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 08:57 am
 Quote  Reply 
"So what are the rules in your location Count." 

 TDF

If a location derives more than 51% of the business from the sales of alcohol they have to post a 51% sign here in Texas.  You can consume but you cannot be intoxicated.  You can only carry concealed there's no open carry here.  ( you could open carry your rifle into a bar ) but that wouldn't fly.... 

TOF
Regular Member


Joined: Sun Nov 2nd, 2008
Location: Happy Jack, Arizona USA
Posts: 185
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 04:05 pm
 Quote  Reply 
It sounds like you could use a bit of improvement also. Are your legislators working on it?

Do you still have dry counties?

Count
Founder's Club Member
 

Joined: Fri Mar 9th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 266
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 04:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Yes, we have dry counties.  The prohibition is for a 51% establishment only.  If you are not in one (such as a restaurant) you can sit at the bar carrying and drinking, but the definition of intoxication can be stretched if you make the cop mad....

Notso
Activist Member
 

Joined: Sun May 13th, 2007
Location: Laveen, Arizona USA
Posts: 284
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 04:51 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I believe SB1113 started out with a '51%' rule, but it was dropped and replaced with the 'onsite kitchen' wording. Not sure how they worked that.

Count
Founder's Club Member
 

Joined: Fri Mar 9th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 266
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 18th, 2009 05:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am so mad the NRA watered it down from the original version because they don't want to put up a good fight.  It is absurd to create one tier of laws for open carriers and another tier of laws for concealed permit holders carrying concealed.  I rather see this bill be killed and start over with guts.  This is why I do not donate to the NRA anymore.


 Current time is 06:12 am
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  





Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez