| Author | Post |
|---|
JR Ewing
Regular Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 12:37 pm |
|
Hey, you folks out in AZ (and 0thers) might want to hit this poll
[url=http://news.aol.com/article/arizona-guns-bars/551844?icid=webmail|wbml-aim|dl3|link5|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Farizona-guns-bars%2F551844]http://news.aol.com/article/arizona-guns-bars/551844?icid=webmail|wbml-aim|dl3|link5|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Farizona-guns-bars%2F551844[/url]
|
Kildars
Regular Member
|
Posted: Wed Jul 8th, 2009 09:25 am |
|
I'd be interested to see a court challenge to the law if someone was ever cited for carrying in a restaurant (assuming the owner doesn't care). The AZ constitution seems pretty plain to me.
|
protector84
Regular Member
| Joined: | Sat Oct 6th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 475 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 9th, 2009 06:02 am |
|
I can guess what path the enforcement would take. While the Constitution treats guns as rights, it treats liquor as a privilege. Since a liquor license is a privilege then the license is likely what they would go after, not you. Utilizing private property rights, it would be at the owner's/manager's request for you to leave.
|
Notso
Activist Member
| Joined: | Sun May 13th, 2007 |
| Location: | Laveen, Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 284 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13th, 2009 05:27 pm |
|
| I think today is the day, SB1113(and the other gun bills) either get vetoed or not today.
|
kenpoprofessor
Regular Member
| Joined: | Mon May 26th, 2008 |
| Location: | Phoenix AZ |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14th, 2009 03:02 am |
|
Brewer signed this bill, it should go into effect in 90 days.
Have a great gun carryin' Kenpo day
Clyde
|
Pistol-Packing-Preacher-in-PV
Regular Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14th, 2009 04:39 am |
|
Alright!
About stinkin' time. I've really been tired of "breaking the law" these past several years whilst carrying in restaurants (under the "no harm no foul" assumption, of course).
|
Sonora Rebel
Regular Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14th, 2009 07:37 pm |
|
| CC is considered priveledge of 'mode'... which is why the CWP is required. Bearing the weapon is a right... but the manner of doing it is not (unless borne openly). I forgot when CC was even introduced... '94 I think. I didn't pay much attention to it at the time 'cause it didn't affect me. This won't affect me much 'cause I do not conceal normally... and I'm gonna drink a beer (or two) normally. So... I don't see what difference this makes... 'cause I go out to my truck 'n strap on my gunbelt one way or the other anyway. So does everyone else who carries open. It's a start... i guess.
|
Mike
Super Moderator
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15th, 2009 04:55 am |
|
kenpoprofessor wrote: Brewer signed this bill, it should go into effect in 90 days.
so, has anyone verified what day exactly this goes into effect? also, does the new statute require concealment inside restaurants serving alcohol?? Or can CHP holders carry openly inside restaurants serving alcohol?
|
WVCDL
State Researcher
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15th, 2009 05:33 am |
|
Mike wrote: kenpoprofessor wrote: Brewer signed this bill, it should go into effect in 90 days.
so, has anyone verified what day exactly this goes into effect? also, does the new statute require concealment inside restaurants serving alcohol?? Or can CHP holders carry openly inside restaurants serving alcohol?
In Arizona, all bills generally take effect 90 days after adjournment sine die of the legislative session. See Ariz. Const. Art. 4, § 1(3).
The bill does indeed requires concealment inside restaurants. Arizona becomes only the second state after Alaska to require handguns to be concealed inside restaurants. See Alaska Stat. § 11.61.220(a)(2) and (d).
|
Current time is 04:49 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 |
|
