OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum > Stories From The States > Montana > Interior won't challenge rule on guns in parks





Interior won't challenge rule on guns in parks
 Moderated by: jpierce  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
JBinMontana
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Sep 10th, 2008
Location: Kalispell, Montana USA
Posts: 252
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 18th, 2009 03:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
AP News Link

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration said Friday it will not appeal a federal court ruling that prohibits carrying loaded guns in national parks and wildlife refuges.

Instead, the Interior Department said it will conduct a full environmental review of an earlier policy that allowed concealed, loaded guns in parks and refuges.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly struck down the gun policy last month. She called the rule, issued in the waning days of the Bush administration, severely flawed and said officials failed to evaluate its possible environmental impacts, as required by law. The judge set an April 20 deadline for the Interior Department to indicate its likely response.

The Bush rule, which took effect in January, allowed visitors to carry a loaded gun into a park or wildlife refuge as long as the person had a permit for a concealed weapon and the state where the park or refuge was located allowed concealed firearms. Previously, guns in parks had been severely restricted.

Kendra Barkoff, a spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, said Friday that the department is not completely discarding the Bush rule. Instead, she said that officials intend to complete a comprehensive environmental impact statement that analyzes the possible effects of the Bush rule, as well as a range of alternatives.

The review is expected to take several months at least. In the meantime, 26-year-old restrictions that had been in place before the rule change remain in effect.

Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which filed a lawsuit to block the Bush rule, said he was pleased at the Obama administration's decision.

"Semiautomatic weapons have no place in the valleys of Yellowstone, on the cliffs of Yosemite or under the torch of the Statue of Liberty," he said.

Helmke said the government should not spend any more resources analyzing the old Bush rule, but added: "We hope and expect that the Obama administration will conclude that the rule can only make our parks more dangerous and should not be implemented."

In her 44-page ruling last month, Kollar-Kotelly called the rule-making process used by the Bush Interior Department "astoundingly flawed." She noted that officials failed to perform an environmental assessment, which calls for the government to take into account such factors as public safety and the "human environment."

Even without an appeal by the Obama administration, the court case is likely to continue. The National Rifle Association has filed a separate appeal of the ruling. A spokesman has said the group will pursue all legal and legislative avenues "to defend the American people's right to self-defense."

Meanwhile, lawmakers who support gun-owners' rights have introduced legislation to reinstate the Bush rule. Bills introduced by Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., would allow citizens to carry concealed firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. Crapo's bill is co-sponsored by Montana Democrats Max Baucus and Jon Tester, Democratic Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln as well as Republican Sen. Robert Bennett of Utah. Two dozen House members - all but one Republican - have co-sponsored the House bill. Rep. Glenn Nye of Virginia is the sole Democrat to back the bill.

NavyLT
Regular Member
 

Joined: Fri May 18th, 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, Washington USA
Posts: 1462
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 18th, 2009 05:48 pm
 Quote  Reply 
"Semiautomatic weapons have no place in the valleys of Yellowstone, on the cliffs of Yosemite or under the torch of the Statue of Liberty," he said.

Just how the heck do you suppose the statue of liberty got there in the first place?  Seems to me that it was a bunch of ARMED CITIZENS that are responsible for that.

JBinMontana
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Sep 10th, 2008
Location: Kalispell, Montana USA
Posts: 252
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Apr 18th, 2009 09:53 pm
 Quote  Reply 
NavyLT wrote: "Semiautomatic weapons have no place in the valleys of Yellowstone, on the cliffs of Yosemite or under the torch of the Statue of Liberty," he said.

Just how the heck do you suppose the statue of liberty got there in the first place?  Seems to me that it was a bunch of ARMED CITIZENS that are responsible for that.

Nope, the Statue of Liberty was a gift from France to the United States.

NavyLT
Regular Member
 

Joined: Fri May 18th, 2007
Location: Oak Harbor, Washington USA
Posts: 1462
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 01:08 am
 Quote  Reply 
JBinMontana wrote: NavyLT wrote: "Semiautomatic weapons have no place in the valleys of Yellowstone, on the cliffs of Yosemite or under the torch of the Statue of Liberty," he said.

Just how the heck do you suppose the statue of liberty got there in the first place?  Seems to me that it was a bunch of ARMED CITIZENS that are responsible for that.

Nope, the Statue of Liberty was a gift from France to the United States.
But if it wasn't for armed citizens revolting against a tryannical government, we wouldn't have the United States.  Would France have given the Statue of Liberty to a colony of England, I wonder?

KBCraig
Regular Member
 

Joined: Tue Aug 7th, 2007
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 1497
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 04:03 am
 Quote  Reply 
JBinMontana wrote: AP News Link
...
Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which filed a lawsuit to block the Bush rule, said he was pleased at the Obama administration's decision.

"Semiautomatic weapons have no place in the valleys of Yellowstone, on the cliffs of Yosemite or under the torch of the Statue of Liberty," he said.

Somebody forgot to tell these folks:

http://www.nps.gov/ozar/parkmgmt/images/ranger_w_car.jpg


http://www.tampabay.com/multimedia/archive/00023/python450_23760c.jpg


http://www.rangerfop.com/images/Samuel-GLCA-sm.jpeg


http://indianlake.com/harvestranger.jpg

(Okay, that one is a state park ranger, not NPS. BUT THERE ARE CHILDREN!"

http://www.bitetheday.com/images/Park_Ranger_Theresa___dogs.jpg


Sonora Rebel
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Aug 6th, 2008
Location: Picture Rocks, Arizona USA
Posts: 2577
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 06:56 am
 Quote  Reply 
"Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which filed a lawsuit to block the Bush rule, said he was pleased at the Obama administration's decision.

"Semiautomatic weapons have no place in the valleys of Yellowstone, on the cliffs of Yosemite or under the torch of the Statue of Liberty," he said."

'Can't carry anything in NYC anyway... (where do they get these people?) 'n doubtful this metro dweeb has been anywhere near Yellowstone or Yosemite.  I carry everyday thru a National Park... It's the only way in/out of here.  I OC... 'loaded' in my truck. I'm not alone in this.  I reckon there's a lotta folks who do the same all over... having to traverse sections of Parks to get anywhere.   It's a county road... but the Rangers patrol it.

MT GUNNY
Regular Member


Joined: Sat Jul 21st, 2007
Location: Kalispell, Montana USA
Posts: 238
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat May 30th, 2009 02:14 am
 Quote  Reply 
Down with The Brady Camp:)

JBinMontana
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Sep 10th, 2008
Location: Kalispell, Montana USA
Posts: 252
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jun 4th, 2009 04:59 am
 Quote  Reply 
:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate


 Current time is 11:25 am





Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez