OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 






ACCOUNTABILITY
 Moderated by: jpierce  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
S.E.WI
Regular Member
 

Joined: Fri Jul 18th, 2008
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Posts: 136
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jul 28th, 2008 09:02 pm
 Quote  Reply 
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
42 U.S.C. Chapter 21
SUBCHAPTER I--GENERALLY
Sec. 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

(R.S. Sec. 1979; Pub. L. 96-170, Sec. 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284.)

 


The Constitution Comes Before Statutes, Edicts, Ordinances, Rules or Regulations


Article VI, U.S. Constitution
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution ; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

 

The Supreme Court Ruling that reasonable regulations can be made is a direct violation of Article VI since any regulation is an "infringement" and reasonable is very subjective.  I would hate to read about another victim but when it happens; I would like to read about the family filing suit against judges, legislators, police and everyone that infringed on the victim's right to bear arms.:X


 Current time is 07:26 am





Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez