OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum > Open Carry Brigade > News & Political Alerts > -Cop's Kid Shoots him in back, Cop Sues Gun Maker!






-Cop's Kid Shoots him in back, Cop Sues Gun Maker!
 Moderated by: jpierce  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Ghost1776
Supporting Member


Joined: Thu Jul 10th, 2008
Location: NRA Country Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 12:45 am
 Quote  Reply 
Officer hurt in accidental shooting sues gun maker
--The Associated Press
--Article Launched: 07/09/2008 10:39:23 PM PDT

LOS ANGELES—An off-duty Los Angeles police officer who was paralyzed after his young son accidentally shot him in 2006 filed a lawsuit Wednesday against the manufacturer of the gun involved in the accident.

Enrique Chavez of Anaheim was shot in the back by his 3-year-old son after the boy grabbed his father’s Glock 21—a .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol—from the back seat of his pickup truck................."

-Source
http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_9834513?nclick_check=1


COMMENT: What about the father’s responsibility to secure his weapon?


Attached Image (viewed 418 times):

im the nra.jpg

Sitrep
Supporting Member


Joined: Fri May 25th, 2007
Location: Here And There, Washington USA
Posts: 150
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 01:41 am
 Quote  Reply 
You really can't go turning your back on a 3 year old.

Ghost1776
Supporting Member


Joined: Thu Jul 10th, 2008
Location: NRA Country Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 5
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 01:47 am
 Quote  Reply 
so true, kids like to put their hands on everything. what amazes me is that he wants to sue the gun maker! i wonder if someone put him up to that.

;)

SouthernBoy
Supporting Member


Joined: Sat May 12th, 2007
Location: Western Prince William County, Virginia USA
Posts: 1956
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 09:53 am
 Quote  Reply 
He can certainly try to sue, but he won't have much of a case. By virtue of the fact that the gun fired when the trigger was pulled proves that it operated as designed and this means it was without flaw (faultless). Yes, he will argue that there were no external operator-controllable safeties, but that is not the way in which the weapon was designed. He will loose.

 

41 Magnum
Supporting Member
 

Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2008
Location: UTAH-life Member: NRA, GOA, CCRKBA
Posts: 255
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 12:03 pm
 Quote  Reply 
It's sad, BUT-

It's a classic case of someone who's around guns all the time getting a little too complacent.

Last edited on Fri Jul 11th, 2008 12:03 pm by 41 Magnum

Doug Huffman
State Researcher
 

Joined: Fri Jun 9th, 2006
Location: Galt's Gulch, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 5863
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 12:38 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Another cop gone to the Dark Side.  Unfortunately it is a short trip for some.


Either we are equal or we are not.  Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns and the truth.  NRA KMA$$

Pointman
Supporting Member


Joined: Mon Feb 18th, 2008
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 1318
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 12:40 pm
 Quote  Reply 
There's more to the story. The officer broke California law by not securing his gun nor his child (no kid seat) in the truck. Somehow he skated on the charges, retired from the department so he could leach off taxpayers, and is suing Glock because a safety mechanism was non-existant; the Los Angeles Police Revolver and Athletic Club, which sold Chavez the gun in 2003; Uncle Mike's and Bushnell Outdoor Products, which manufactured a gun hip holster for the firearm; and Turner's Outdoorsman, which sold him the holster. What a scumbag.

Dustin
Supporting Member


Joined: Wed May 28th, 2008
Location: Lake Charles Area, Louisiana USA
Posts: 1514
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 01:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Larry the Cable Guy might not be the best, or most intelligent man, but he defintely hits the nail on the head with this quote,

The gun was just sitting there! If guns kill people, I can blame misspelled words on my pencil!

 

kimbercarrier
Activist Member


Joined: Mon Jul 24th, 2006
Location: Hampton, Virginia USA
Posts: 527
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 03:11 pm
 Quote  Reply 
So now holsters are responsible for shootings? Better keep all 0f mine locked up.
:banghead::banghead::banghead:

Why didn't he also sue his wife for having a child and the truck maker ?

Doug Huffman
State Researcher
 

Joined: Fri Jun 9th, 2006
Location: Galt's Gulch, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 5863
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 03:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
kimbercarrier wrote: Why didn't he also sue his wife for having a child and the truck maker ?
'The truck maker,' for them having a child?   Eewww, TMI!

SQLtables
Supporting Member


Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2008
Location: VP MOC, Inc. Frankenmuth, Michigan USA
Posts: 990
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 03:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
kimbercarrier wrote: So now holsters are responsible for shootings? Better keep all 0f mine locked up.
:banghead::banghead::banghead:

Why didn't he also sue his wife for having a child and the truck maker ?


hm... good thinking...might not be such a bad idea :quirky

There is something seriously wrong with this guy.  I feel bad for the kid...

AZkopper
Supporting Member


Joined: Fri Jun 20th, 2008
Location: Prescott, Arizona USA
Posts: 308
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 07:10 pm
 Quote  Reply 
wow.....

just wow......

johnnyb
Banned


Joined: Mon Jun 9th, 2008
Location: St Helens, Oregon USA
Posts: 340
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 07:35 pm
 Quote  Reply 
send him to mexico

Orygunner
Supporting Member


Joined: Thu Jun 5th, 2008
Location: Springfield, Oregon USA
Posts: 705
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 07:37 pm
 Quote  Reply 
We had a similar (wrongful suing of a manufacturer for self-stupidity) situation here in Springfield, Oregon with a riding lawn mower...

A guy bought a new John Deere riding lawn mower, that has a built in safety feature that disconnects the blades when you put it in reverse.  The owner's guide gives specific instructions of how and why the safety feature is there, as well as recommendations of NOT disabling the device, especially if you have children around.  It also states to not allow children in the yard while mowing, and to make sure you look well behind you when backing up the mower...

The guy disabled the device and ended up backing the mower over his 2 year old daughter, severing her leg at the hip.

The father has sued John Deere BECAUSE they designed it with an override function for the safety device.  He also names the local dealer because they did not "adequately instruct" him on the safe operation of the mower.

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_010908_news_lawnmower_lawsuit.632603a.html

Talk about lack of taking responsibility for your own screw ups!  RTFM! Warnings are not JUST there to protect against lawsuits. If you choose to disregard the warnings in the manual, expect trouble!

I'm not sure if it's accurate, but a Glock manual I found online says on the FIRST PAGE:

"Any firearm, including the GLOCK pistols, is a dangerous weapon, it must not become accessible to unauthorized persons, especially children"

Although it's a sad thing when your mistake causes serious injury, trying to win the lawsuit lottery because of YOUR mistake is total BS, expecially when common sense and/or manufacturers warnings warn you in advance.

...:banghead:...
...Orygunner...

DopaVash
Founder's Club Member


Joined: Fri Apr 11th, 2008
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 298
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Fri Jul 11th, 2008 07:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Yet another case of someone shuffing off responsibility to someone else. As someone said on TXCDL.org, I think he should be jailed for child endangerment.

Toad
Supporting Member


Joined: Sun Jun 18th, 2006
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 279
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jul 12th, 2008 02:15 pm
 Quote  Reply 

How come he isn't suing the miners as well?...if they never pulled the raw materials out of the ground the gun, bullets, and truck would not have been made. After all it is the miners fault not the ignorantly irresponsible person. They should have known that the product that the so recklessly pushed on the people would eventually be made into dangerous consumer goods.
:banghead:

Last edited on Sat Jul 12th, 2008 02:17 pm by Toad

Dutch Uncle
Activist Member


Joined: Thu May 11th, 2006
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 1316
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jul 12th, 2008 02:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 
He should sue his parents for raising him to be a pinhead.

If he loses, maybe he can sue his lawyer for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

The mind reels......

deepdiver
Activist Member


Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2007
Location: Missouri USA
Posts: 4508
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jul 12th, 2008 10:39 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Dumba$$ should sue himself for being an idiot and a tool.

rodbender
Founder's Club Member


Joined: Mon Jun 23rd, 2008
Location: Elgin, Texas USA
Posts: 946
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jul 12th, 2008 11:44 pm
 Quote  Reply 
How callused can you guys be?  Just because someone is trying to fund his retirement fund with someone elses money. Down here in Texas it's called theft, unless an attorney is your accomplice. Reminds me of the old lady that put a hot cup of coffee on the dash of a moving vehicle, whereas it spilled on her twat and she became a multi-millionaire. Wasn't it Will Rogers that said "The thing about common sense is, it ain't too common."?

rodbender
Founder's Club Member


Joined: Mon Jun 23rd, 2008
Location: Elgin, Texas USA
Posts: 946
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sat Jul 12th, 2008 11:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
How callused can you guys be?  Just because someone is trying to fund his retirement fund with someone elses money. Down here in Texas it's called theft, unless an attorney is your accomplice. Reminds me of the old lady that put a hot cup of coffee on the dash of a moving vehicle, whereas it spilled on her twat and she became a multi-millionaire. Wasn't it Will Rogers that said "The thing about common sense is, it ain't too common."?


 Current time is 07:07 am
Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  





Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez