OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 

OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum > Open Carry Brigade > News & Political Alerts > Petition for Certiorari in Second Circuit Right To Bear Arms Incorporation Case





Petition for Certiorari in Second Circuit Right To Bear Arms Incorporation Case
 Moderated by: jpierce  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Jonesy
Regular Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 18th, 2009
Location: Alexandria, Virginia USA
Posts: 197
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jun 28th, 2009 04:36 am
 Quote  Reply 
This is the Sotomayor case on nunchuku.

Short Table of Contents:
I. The Circuits Are Divided by the Questions of Whether the Second
Amendment Is Incorporated Against the States Through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Whether
the Courts of Appeals Have Power Even to Reach That Issue.

II. The Court Should Also Grant Certiorari Over the Question of Whether the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Applies the Second Amendment Against the States.
http://homepages.nyu.edu/~jmm257/cert-petition-w-appendix.pdf

Doug Huffman
Regular Member


Joined: Fri Jun 9th, 2006
Location: Galt's Gulch, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 6947
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Jun 28th, 2009 05:53 am
 Quote  Reply 
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/sotomayor-2d-am-case-now-at-court/#more-10066

rpyne
Regular Member
 

Joined: Tue Oct 23rd, 2007
Location: Provo, Utah USA
Posts: 580
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Jun 29th, 2009 11:55 pm
 Quote  Reply 
The difficulty that the Maloney case could encounter as the best vehicle for review of the issue, however, would arise if the Senate confirmed Judge Sotomayor’s nomination for a seat on the Supreme Court. Because she was on the appeals court panel that decided that very case, she presumably would not feel free to participate in the case at the Court.
Yeh, right. Ms. touchy feely would not "feel" free to participate. BS, From the clips I have seen of this creature's actions on the bench there is nothing that would slow her down in pushing her opinion on everyone involved.

marshaul
Activist Member


Joined: Mon Aug 13th, 2007
Location: San Francisco, California USA
Posts: 3363
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
How does it matter? Look who she's replacing. 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Who cares?

Doug Huffman
Regular Member


Joined: Fri Jun 9th, 2006
Location: Galt's Gulch, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 6947
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:19 am
 Quote  Reply 
marshaul wrote: How does it matter? Look who she's replacing. 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Who cares?I think that, in the grand mosaic of history, this is the essential point.

The make-up of the court won't change and the left gets the weak-sister, hermana débil. Zwakke zuster.

marshaul
Activist Member


Joined: Mon Aug 13th, 2007
Location: San Francisco, California USA
Posts: 3363
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:29 am
 Quote  Reply 
Exactly.

Virginiaplanter
Regular Member


Joined: Tue Jun 5th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 297
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Jun 30th, 2009 03:53 am
 Quote  Reply 
To the people who wrote the petition, just a friendly correction. Henry St. George Tucker did not write Blackstone's Commentaries. St. George Tucker did. Henry St. George Tucker was the son of St. George Tucker.

Jonesy
Regular Member
 

Joined: Wed Mar 18th, 2009
Location: Alexandria, Virginia USA
Posts: 197
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 12:51 am
 Quote  Reply 
Virginiaplanter wrote: To the people who wrote the petition, just a friendly correction. Henry St. George Tucker did not write Blackstone's Commentaries. St. George Tucker did. Henry St. George Tucker was the son of St. George Tucker.

Well of course, everyone knows that:D


 Current time is 11:54 am





Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez