OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum Home



 Moderated by: jpierce  
AuthorPost
ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
I think it might be a good idea to change the OC carry designation form rural to none.

It turns out a literal reading of the FELONY UUW act, would cover loaded carry in a rural area, even though it is exempted in the misdemeanor UUW statute.

Incidentally, the felony UUW statute would appear to apply to such innocent things as shooting at your grandpa's farm. There is a bill to fix this situation. It appears to have a good shot at passing. It would not change the felony nature of OC in a rural area though.

The impetus for getting this fixed was a guy who got nailed in Cook County under circumstances that apparently were innocent but in technical violation.

Last edited on Tue May 19th, 2009 10:22 pm by ilbob

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: I think it might be a good idea to change the OC carry designation form rural to none.

It turns out a literal reading of the FELONY UUW act, would cover loaded carry in a rural area, even though it is exempted in the misdemeanor UUW statute.

Incidentally, the felony UUW statute would appear to apply to such innocent things as shooting at your grandpa's farm. There is a bill to fix this situation. It appears to have a good shot at passing. It would not change the felony nature of OC in a rural area though.

The impetus for getting this fixed was a guy who got nailed in Cook County under circumstances that apparently were innocent but in technical violation.
Please quote the part of the UUW act that makes rural open carry a felony, I can't find it.

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
read the felony UUW statute. no exception for rural areas like there is in the non-felony uuw.

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: read the felony UUW statute. no exception for rural areas like there is in the non-felony uuw.That would be for concealed carry!

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
read what it actually says. not what you want it to say.

(720 ILCS 5/24-1.6) 
Sec. 24-1.6. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon. 
(a) A person commits the offense of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon when he or she knowingly: 
(1) Carries on or about his or her person or in any vehicle or concealed on or about his or her person except when on his or her land or in his or her abode or fixed place of business any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm;
 ...

and (3) One of the following factors is present:
(A) the firearm possessed was uncased, loaded, and immediately accessible at the time of the offense

 

Mike
Super Moderator
 

Joined: Sat May 13th, 2006
Location: Fairfax County, Virginia USA
Posts: 6430
Status:  Offline
Wonna post the whole statute?

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
(720 ILCS 5/24‑1.6)
    Sec. 24‑1.6. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon.
    (a) A person commits the offense of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon when he or she knowingly:
        (1) Carries on or about his or her person or in any vehicle or concealed on or about his or her person except when on his or her land or in his or her abode or fixed place of business any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm; or

        (2) Carries or possesses on or about his or her person, upon any public street, alley, or other public lands within the corporate limits of a city, village or incorporated town, except when an invitee thereon or therein, for the purpose of the display of such weapon or the lawful commerce in weapons, or except when on his or her own land or in his or her own abode or fixed place of business, any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm; and

        (3) One of the following factors is present:
            (A) the firearm possessed was uncased, loaded and immediately accessible at the time of the offense; or

            (B) the firearm possessed was uncased, unloaded and the ammunition for the weapon was immediately accessible at the time of the offense; or

            (C) the person possessing the firearm has not been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card; or

            (D) the person possessing the weapon was

        

previously adjudicated a delinquent minor under the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 for an act that if committed by an adult would be a felony; or

            (E) the person possessing the weapon was engaged in a misdemeanor violation of the Cannabis Control Act, in a misdemeanor violation of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, or in a misdemeanor violation of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act; or

            (F) the person possessing the weapon is a member of a street gang or is engaged in street gang related activity, as defined in Section 10 of the Illinois Streetgang Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act; or

            (G) the person possessing the weapon had a orderof protection issued against him or her within the previous 2 years; or

           (H) the person possessing the weapon was engaged

        

in the commission or attempted commission of a misdemeanor involving the use or threat of violence against the person or property of another; or

            (I) the person possessing the weapon was under

        

21 years of age and in possession of a handgun as defined in Section 24‑3, unless the person under 21 is engaged in lawful activities under the Wildlife Code or described in subsection 24‑2(b)(1), (b)(3), or 24‑2(f).

    (b) "Stun gun or taser" as used in this Section has the same definition given to it in Section 24‑1 of this Code.
    (c) This Section does not apply to or affect the transportation or possession of weapons that:
            (i) are broken down in a non‑functioning state; or

       (ii) are not immediately accessible; or
            (iii) are unloaded and enclosed in a case,

        

firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card.

    (d) Sentence. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon is a Class 4 felony; a second or subsequent offense is a Class 2 felony for which the person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 3 years and not more than 7 years. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon by a person who has been previously convicted of a felony in this State or another jurisdiction is a Class 2 felony for which the person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 3 years and not more than 7 years. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon while wearing or in possession of body armor as defined in Section 33F‑1 by a person who has not been issued a valid Firearms Owner's Identification Card in accordance with Section 5 of the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act is a Class X felony. The possession of each firearm in violation of this Section constitutes a single and separate violation.
(Source: P.A. 94‑72, eff. 1‑1‑06; 94‑284, eff. 7‑21‑05; 94‑556, eff. 9‑11‑05; 95‑331, eff. 8‑21‑07.)


edited to remove excessive spaces.

Last edited on Fri May 22nd, 2009 01:55 pm by lockman

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
Sec. 24‑2. Exemptions.
    (a) Subsections 24‑1(a)(3), 24‑1(a)(4), 24‑1(a)(10), and 24‑1(a)(13) and Section 24‑1.6 do not apply to or affect any of the following:
        (1) Peace officers, and any person summoned by a     

peace officer to assist in making arrests or preserving the peace, while actually engaged in assisting such officer.

        (2) Wardens, superintendents and keepers of prisons,

    

penitentiaries, jails and other institutions for the detention of persons accused or convicted of an offense, while in the performance of their official duty, or while commuting between their homes and places of employment.

        (3) Members of the Armed Services or Reserve Forces

    

of the United States or the Illinois National Guard or the Reserve Officers Training Corps, while in the performance of their official duty.

        (4) Special agents employed by a railroad or a

    

public utility to perform police functions, and guards of armored car companies, while actually engaged in the performance of the duties of their employment or commuting between their homes and places of employment; and watchmen while actually engaged in the performance of the duties of their employment.

        (5) Persons licensed as private security

    

contractors, private detectives, or private alarm contractors, or employed by an agency certified by the Department of Professional Regulation, if their duties include the carrying of a weapon under the provisions of the Private Detective, Private Alarm, Private Security, Fingerprint Vendor, and Locksmith Act of 2004, while actually engaged in the performance of the duties of their employment or commuting between their homes and places of employment, provided that such commuting is accomplished within one hour from departure from home or place of employment, as the case may be. Persons exempted under this subdivision (a)(5) shall be required to have completed a course of study in firearms handling and training approved and supervised by the Department of Professional Regulation as prescribed by Section 28 of the Private Detective, Private Alarm, Private Security, Fingerprint Vendor, and Locksmith Act of 2004, prior to becoming eligible for this exemption. The Department of Professional Regulation shall provide suitable documentation demonstrating the successful completion of the prescribed firearms training. Such documentation shall be carried at all times when such persons are in possession of a concealable weapon.

        (6) Any person regularly employed in a commercial or

    

industrial operation as a security guard for the protection of persons employed and private property related to such commercial or industrial operation, while actually engaged in the performance of his or her duty or traveling between sites or properties belonging to the employer, and who, as a security guard, is a member of a security force of at least 5 persons registered with the Department of Professional Regulation; provided that such security guard has successfully completed a course of study, approved by and supervised by the Department of Professional Regulation, consisting of not less than 40 hours of training that includes the theory of law enforcement, liability for acts, and the handling of weapons. A person shall be considered eligible for this exemption if he or she has completed the required 20 hours of training for a security officer and 20 hours of required firearm training, and has been issued a firearm control card by the Department of Professional Regulation. Conditions for the renewal of firearm control cards issued under the provisions of this Section shall be the same as for those cards issued under the provisions of the Private Detective, Private Alarm, Private Security, Fingerprint Vendor, and Locksmith Act of 2004. Such firearm control card shall be carried by the security guard at all times when he or she is in possession of a concealable weapon.

        (7) Agents and investigators of the Illinois

    

Legislative Investigating Commission authorized by the Commission to carry the weapons specified in subsections 24‑1(a)(3) and 24‑1(a)(4), while on duty in the course of any investigation for the Commission.

        (8) Persons employed by a financial institution for

    

the protection of other employees and property related to such financial institution, while actually engaged in the performance of their duties, commuting between their homes and places of employment, or traveling between sites or properties owned or operated by such financial institution, provided that any person so employed has successfully completed a course of study, approved by and supervised by the Department of Professional Regulation, consisting of not less than 40 hours of training which includes theory of law enforcement, liability for acts, and the handling of weapons. A person shall be considered to be eligible for this exemption if he or she has completed the required 20 hours of training for a security officer and 20 hours of required firearm training, and has been issued a firearm control card by the Department of Professional Regulation. Conditions for renewal of firearm control cards issued under the provisions of this Section shall be the same as for those issued under the provisions of the Private Detective, Private Alarm, Private Security, Fingerprint Vendor, and Locksmith Act of 2004. Such firearm control card shall be carried by the person so trained at all times when such person is in possession of a concealable weapon. For purposes of this subsection, "financial institution" means a bank, savings and loan association, credit union or company providing armored car services.

        (9) Any person employed by an armored car company to

    

drive an armored car, while actually engaged in the performance of his duties.

        (10) Persons who have been classified as peace

    

officers pursuant to the Peace Officer Fire Investigation Act.

        (11) Investigators of the Office of the State's

    

Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor authorized by the board of governors of the Office of the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor to carry weapons pursuant to Section 7.06 of the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Act.

        (12) Special investigators appointed by a State's

    

Attorney under Section 3‑9005 of the Counties Code.

        (12.5) Probation officers while in the performance

    

of their duties, or while commuting between their homes, places of employment or specific locations that are part of their assigned duties, with the consent of the chief judge of the circuit for which they are employed.

        (13) Court Security Officers while in the

    

performance of their official duties, or while commuting between their homes and places of employment, with the consent of the Sheriff.

        (13.5) A person employed as an armed security guard

    

at a nuclear energy, storage, weapons or development site or facility regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission who has completed the background screening and training mandated by the rules and regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

        (14) Manufacture, transportation, or sale of weapons

    

to persons authorized under subdivisions (1) through (13.5) of this subsection to possess those weapons.

    (b) Subsections 24‑1(a)(4) and 24‑1(a)(10) and Section 24‑1.6 do not apply to or affect any of the following:
        (1) Members of any club or organization organized

    

for the purpose of practicing shooting at targets upon established target ranges, whether public or private, and patrons of such ranges, while such members or patrons are using their firearms on those target ranges.

        (2) Duly authorized military or civil organizations

    

while parading, with the special permission of the Governor.

        (3) Hunters, trappers or fishermen with a license or

    

permit while engaged in hunting, trapping or fishing.

        (4) Transportation of weapons that are broken down

    

in a non‑functioning state or are not immediately accessible.

    (c) Subsection 24‑1(a)(7) does not apply to or affect any of the following:
        (1) Peace officers while in performance of their

    

official duties.

        (2) Wardens, superintendents and keepers of prisons,

    

penitentiaries, jails and other institutions for the detention of persons accused or convicted of an offense.

        (3) Members of the Armed Services or Reserve Forces

    

of the United States or the Illinois National Guard, while in the performance of their official duty.

        (4) Manufacture, transportation, or sale of machine

    

guns to persons authorized under subdivisions (1) through (3) of this subsection to possess machine guns, if the machine guns are broken down in a non‑functioning state or are not immediately accessible.

        (5) Persons licensed under federal law to

    

manufacture any weapon from which 8 or more shots or bullets can be discharged by a single function of the firing device, or ammunition for such weapons, and actually engaged in the business of manufacturing such weapons or ammunition, but only with respect to activities which are within the lawful scope of such business, such as the manufacture, transportation, or testing of such weapons or ammunition. This exemption does not authorize the general private possession of any weapon from which 8 or more shots or bullets can be discharged by a single function of the firing device, but only such possession and activities as are within the lawful scope of a licensed manufacturing business described in this paragraph.

        During transportation, such weapons shall be broken

    

down in a non‑functioning state or not immediately accessible.

        (6) The manufacture, transport, testing, delivery,

    

transfer or sale, and all lawful commercial or experimental activities necessary thereto, of rifles, shotguns, and weapons made from rifles or shotguns, or ammunition for such rifles, shotguns or weapons, where engaged in by a person operating as a contractor or subcontractor pursuant to a contract or subcontract for the development and supply of such rifles, shotguns, weapons or ammunition to the United States government or any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States, when such activities are necessary and incident to fulfilling the terms of such contract.

        The exemption granted under this subdivision (c)(6)

    

shall also apply to any authorized agent of any such contractor or subcontractor who is operating within the scope of his employment, where such activities involving such weapon, weapons or ammunition are necessary and incident to fulfilling the terms of such contract.

        During transportation, any such weapon shall be

    

broken down in a non‑functioning state, or not immediately accessible.

    (d) Subsection 24‑1(a)(1) does not apply to the purchase, possession or carrying of a black‑jack or slung‑shot by a peace officer.
    (e) Subsection 24‑1(a)(8) does not apply to any owner, manager or authorized employee of any place specified in that subsection nor to any law enforcement officer.
    (f) Subsection 24‑1(a)(4) and subsection 24‑1(a)(10) and Section 24‑1.6 do not apply to members of any club or organization organized for the purpose of practicing shooting at targets upon established target ranges, whether public or private, while using their firearms on those target ranges.
    (g) Subsections 24‑1(a)(11) and 24‑3.1(a)(6) do not apply to:
        (1) Members of the Armed Services or Reserve Forces

    

of the United States or the Illinois National Guard, while in the performance of their official duty.

        (2) Bonafide collectors of antique or surplus

    

military ordinance.

        (3) Laboratories having a department of forensic

    

ballistics, or specializing in the development of ammunition or explosive ordinance.

        (4) Commerce, preparation, assembly or possession of

    

explosive bullets by manufacturers of ammunition licensed by the federal government, in connection with the supply of those organizations and persons exempted by subdivision (g)(1) of this Section, or like organizations and persons outside this State, or the transportation of explosive bullets to any organization or person exempted in this Section by a common carrier or by a vehicle owned or leased by an exempted manufacturer.

    (g‑5) Subsection 24‑1(a)(6) does not apply to or affect persons licensed under federal law to manufacture any device or attachment of any kind designed, used, or intended for use in silencing the report of any firearm, firearms, or ammunition for those firearms equipped with those devices, and actually engaged in the business of manufacturing those devices, firearms, or ammunition, but only with respect to activities that are within the lawful scope of that business, such as the manufacture, transportation, or testing of those devices, firearms, or ammunition. This exemption does not authorize the general private possession of any device or attachment of any kind designed, used, or intended for use in silencing the report of any firearm, but only such possession and activities as are within the lawful scope of a licensed manufacturing business described in this subsection (g‑5). During transportation, those devices shall be detached from any weapon or not immediately accessible.
    (g‑10) Subsections 24‑1(a)(4), 24‑1(a)(8), and 24‑1(a)(10), and Sections 24‑1.6 and 24‑3.1 do not apply to an athlete's possession, transport on official Olympic and Paralympic transit systems established for athletes, or use of competition firearms sanctioned by the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, the International Shooting Sport Federation, or USA Shooting in connection with such athlete's training for and participation in shooting competitions at the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games and sanctioned test events leading up to the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
    (h) An information or indictment based upon a violation of any subsection of this Article need not negative any exemptions contained in this Article. The defendant shall have the burden of proving such an exemption.
    (i) Nothing in this Article shall prohibit, apply to, or affect the transportation, carrying, or possession, of any pistol or revolver, stun gun, taser, or other firearm consigned to a common carrier operating under license of the State of Illinois or the federal government, where such transportation, carrying, or possession is incident to the lawful transportation in which such common carrier is engaged; and nothing in this Article shall prohibit, apply to, or affect the transportation, carrying, or possession of any pistol, revolver, stun gun, taser, or other firearm, not the subject of and regulated by subsection 24‑1(a)(7) or subsection 24‑2(c) of this Article, which is unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container, by the possessor of a valid Firearm Owners Identification Card.
(Source: P.A. 95‑331, eff. 8‑21‑07; 95‑613, eff. 9‑11‑07; 95‑885, eff. 1‑1‑09; 96‑7, eff. 4‑3‑09.)

Venator
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Jan 10th, 2007
Location: President MOC, Inc. Lansing Area, Michigan USA
Posts: 3476
Status:  Offline
 (3) One of the following factors is present:
            (A) the firearm possessed was uncased, loaded and immediately accessible at the time of the offense; or

            (B) the firearm possessed was uncased, unloaded and the ammunition for the weapon was immediately accessible at the time of the offense; or


            (C) the person possessing the firearm has not been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card; or


            (D) the person possessing the weapon was


 


Seems if you have a FOID card you are okay.

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
Venator wrote:  (3) One of the following factors is present:
            (A) the firearm possessed was uncased, loaded and immediately accessible at the time of the offense; or

            (B) the firearm possessed was uncased, unloaded and the ammunition for the weapon was immediately accessible at the time of the offense; or



            (C) the person possessing the firearm has not been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card; or



            (D) the person possessing the weapon was



 



Seems if you have a FOID card you are okay.


note that only ONE of the aggravating factors has to be present for it to be a felony, not all of them.

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
What strikes me as odd is that the UUW statute is silent on open carry in unincorporated areas. But under Aggravated UUW makes it a felony to have a loaded firearm on or about your person (concealed or openly, it is non specific) absent any exemptions in 24-2.

 

One would think the agg UUW would enhance penalties to the existing UUW, but as written appears to stand alone making it a felony to open carry in rural areas absent any exemptions. Under Agg UUW having an FOID card by itself does not negate the other two aggravating conditions.

 

 

 

  Sec. 24‑1.6. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon.
    (a) A person commits the offense of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon when he or she knowingly:
        (1) Carries on or about his or her person or in any vehicle or concealed on or about his or her person except when on his or her land or in his or her abode or fixed place of business any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm


Last edited on Fri May 22nd, 2009 05:50 pm by lockman

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
Odd? All our firearms laws are odd. They are so poorly written it is near impossible to comply with all of them.

Rright this second it is a felony to go shooting as a guest at someone's farm. It is legal for the land owner to shoot there, but not his guests. Similarly, it is a felony for you to go to your neighbors house and have him hand a loaded gun to you.

The NRA is working as we speak to correct this problem via HB182. It appears to have a good chance of passing.

But HB182 has no effect on rural carry at all.

 

Last edited on Fri May 22nd, 2009 06:20 pm by ilbob

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
lockman wrote: What strikes me as odd is that the UUW statute is silent on open carry in unincorporated areas. But under Aggravated UUW makes it a felony to have a loaded firearm on or about your person (concealed or openly, it is non specific) absent any exemptions in 24-2.

 

One would think the agg UUW would enhance penalties to the existing UUW, but as written appears to stand alone making it a felony to open carry in rural areas absent any exemptions. Under Agg UUW having an FOID card by itself does not negate the other two aggravating conditions.

 

 

 

  Sec. 24‑1.6. Aggravated unlawful use of a weapon.
    (a) A person commits the offense of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon when he or she knowingly:
        (1) Carries on or about his or her person or in any vehicle or concealed on or about his or her person except when on his or her land or in his or her abode or fixed place of business any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm
It seems odd to me that Sec.24-1.6(a) (2) says-Carries or possesses on or about his or her person, upon any public steet, alley or other public lands within the corporate limits of a city, village or incorporated town.Why mention carrying or possessing is illegal in a city, village or incorporated town when it it illegal in an unincorporated area as well.  For that matter why mention concealed on or about his or her person when its covered by carries on or about his person?It seems redundant to mention carrys on or about your person and then carries or possesses in (2).


ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
It could have been a mistake. They might have meant to use the same language but screwed it up.

Or maybe someone thought they could improve upon the language and screwed up.

Its unlikely the legislature ever meant to criminalize some of the behaviors that the wording ended up giving us.

Keep in mind that the original wording of the UUW act did not have the 3 exceptions in it that allow us to legally transport firearms at all. I doub that was intentional either. Just bad law writing.
 

Last edited on Sat May 23rd, 2009 04:06 pm by ilbob

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
I guess we won't be having any open carry picnic here in Illinois, even if it is on someones private property in the country.

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: It could have been a mistake. They might have meant to use the same language but screwed it up.

Or maybe someone thought they could improve upon the language and screwed up.

Its unlikely the legislature ever meant to criminalize some of the behaviors that the wording ended up giving us.

Keep in mind that the original wording of the UUW act did not have the 3 exceptions in it that allow us to legally transport firearms at all. I doub that was intentional either. Just bad law writing.
 

The exemption for transporting unloaded and cased by someone posessing a FOID card was part of the "Safe Neighborhoods Act" .   There was discussion at the time that someone transporting down the street a firearm unloaded and in a case.

Mike
Super Moderator
 

Joined: Sat May 13th, 2006
Location: Fairfax County, Virginia USA
Posts: 6430
Status:  Offline
lockman wrote: What strikes me as odd is that the UUW statute is silent on open carry in unincorporated areas. But under Aggravated UUW makes it a felony to have a loaded firearm on or about your person (concealed or openly, it is non specific) absent any exemptions in 24-2.
I think you isloated the proper inquiry - AUUW stand alone by itself?  or does it require a UUW violation to begin with?  The word aggrvated sure seems to imply somthing worse than the underlying basic plain jane offense.

Can one of you guys in IL who have been toying with the idea of an OC picnic obtain some legal advice on this?  Might cost you some money but would be worth it - usually the state bar has a referral service to get a one time consultation for a minimal fee and perhaps if you find the right atty it culd be cleared up right there.

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
junglebob wrote: I guess we won't be having any open carry picnic here in Illinois, even if it is on someones private property in the country.

It will be legal in a few days or weeks if all goes well with HB182.

It would not even need to be in the country, as long as it was on private property and you were invited.

However, a home rule unit could potentially make it illegal within their jurisdiction. They can't make it a felony though. because the state constitution forbids them that power.

Last edited on Sat May 23rd, 2009 09:43 pm by ilbob

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
Mike wrote: lockman wrote: What strikes me as odd is that the UUW statute is silent on open carry in unincorporated areas. But under Aggravated UUW makes it a felony to have a loaded firearm on or about your person (concealed or openly, it is non specific) absent any exemptions in 24-2.
I think you isloated the proper inquiry - AUUW stand alone by itself?  or does it require a UUW violation to begin with?  The word aggrvated sure seems to imply somthing worse than the underlying basic plain jane offense.

Can one of you guys in IL who have been toying with the idea of an OC picnic obtain some legal advice on this?  Might cost you some money but would be worth it - usually the state bar has a referral service to get a one time consultation for a minimal fee and perhaps if you find the right atty it culd be cleared up right there.

Why pay for it? The NRA/ILA guys have lawyers on staff who might be willing to answer the question for free.

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: junglebob wrote: I guess we won't be having any open carry picnic here in Illinois, even if it is on someones private property in the country.

It will be legal in a few days or weeks if all goes well with HB182.

It would not even need to be in the country, as long as it was on private property and you were invited.

However, a home rule unit could potentially make it illegal within their jurisdiction. They can't make it a felony though. because the state constitution forbids them that power.
Wow, so we may actually be able to open carry on private property unless there is a local ordinance against it.    In most states this would be an intollerable infringement on the right to bear arms.

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
In the meantime, you might want to revise your map so someone does not get locked up for 5 years based on a potential mistaken understanding of the law.

Mike wrote:
lockman wrote: What strikes me as odd is that the UUW statute is silent on open carry in unincorporated areas. But under Aggravated UUW makes it a felony to have a loaded firearm on or about your person (concealed or openly, it is non specific) absent any exemptions in 24-2.
I think you isloated the proper inquiry - AUUW stand alone by itself?  or does it require a UUW violation to begin with?  The word aggrvated sure seems to imply somthing worse than the underlying basic plain jane offense.

Can one of you guys in IL who have been toying with the idea of an OC picnic obtain some legal advice on this?  Might cost you some money but would be worth it - usually the state bar has a referral service to get a one time consultation for a minimal fee and perhaps if you find the right atty it culd be cleared up right there.

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2007/1stDistrict/July/1053782.pdf

Mike, a Cook County case charged a man with AUUW for possessing a loaded firearm on private property of his sister. Price was convicted based on the statutory provision included in the exemption "own land". Since the land was not his the exemption did not apply.

I do agree in the meantime that the rural open carry designation should be changed to prohibited.

Good news is that corrective legislation HB0182 has passed both houses of the legislature. But HB182 does require permission of the land owner as part of the exemption except when in an your "abode".

The corrective language would prevent a conviction like in Price but with the land owner permission I believe for the time being Illinois should go red on the map.

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
The Aggravated UUW statute does stand alone and no wording in the statute requires a violation under another section. The offense and the aggravating factors are all laid out within 24-1.6.

My above comments are from the plain text and not from advise of legal council.

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
lockman wrote: The Aggravated UUW statute does stand alone and no wording in the statute requires a violation under another section. The offense and the aggravating factors are all laid out within 24-1.6.

My above comments are from the plain text and not from advise of legal council.

Sounds like "fanny pack transport" is the only way to have a handgun available for protection.

smoking357
Banned


Joined: Mon Dec 29th, 2008
Location: The Land Of The Free
Posts: 1100
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: Odd? All our firearms laws are odd. They are so poorly written it is near impossible to comply with all of them. 


Sure it is. Don't own a gun. You live in a state that hopes its laws frustrate all of its citizens from owning guns. You're swimming upstream by living there.

jayspapa
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sun Jul 27th, 2008
Location: South End Of The State, Illinois USA
Posts: 43
Status:  Offline
Swiming upstream maybe, but swiming . The alternitive is to turn tail and run and I for one am not leaveing ! More and more people are getting involved in this fight and it is starting to make a difference .

 We WILL be the victor!!!!!:celebrate

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
smoking357 wrote: ilbob wrote: Odd? All our firearms laws are odd. They are so poorly written it is near impossible to comply with all of them. 


Sure it is. Don't own a gun. You live in a state that hopes its laws frustrate all of its citizens from owning guns. You're swimming upstream by living there.

I'm curious smoking357 what state are you from Vermont?

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
lockman wrote: The corrective language would prevent a conviction like in Price but with the land owner permission I believe for the time being Illinois should go red on the map.

I would point out that the legislation that was recently passed by both houses of the IL legislature would not affect the rural OC issue at all. It only deals with having firearms on someone else's property with permission.

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
Yes, even under HB0182 any OC/CC on private land other than your own would require permission of the owner.

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
lockman wrote: Yes, even under HB0182 any OC/CC on private land other than your own would require permission of the owner.

and no carry at all in public.

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: lockman wrote: Yes, even under HB0182 any OC/CC on private land other than your own would require permission of the owner.

and no carry at all in public.

Section 3 outlines the circumstances that apply for the aggravated circumstances and unloaded, cased carry is allowed by a FOID card holder. But uncased carry is prohibited loaded or unloaded under this section.

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
I was wondering has there ever been a case someone knows of where a person was open carrying a handgun and arrested for UUW,  and went to court and the case found in their favor or dropped?  Or has their been a case of someone convicted of UUW for open carry in a rural area?

Mike
Super Moderator
 

Joined: Sat May 13th, 2006
Location: Fairfax County, Virginia USA
Posts: 6430
Status:  Offline
Out of an abundance of caution, we now categorize Illinois as a red "open carry banned" state based upon review of the comments above and a look at the Aggravated Unlawful Use of Weapons (Aggrevated UUW) statute which oddly does appear to stand alone. 
 
This means that our base line talking point is "only 7 states ban open carry, and most allow it without any permit."

Last edited on Tue Aug 25th, 2009 12:12 am by Mike

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
Mike wrote: Out of an abundance of caution, we now categorize Illinois as a red "open carry banned" state based upon review of the comments above and a look at the Aggravated Unlawful Use of Weapons (Aggrevated UUW) statute which oddly does appear to stand alone. 
 
This means that our base line talking point is "only 7 states ban open carry, and most allow it without any permit."
Mike,  That's a good change.   I'd hate to see someone visiting Illinois open carry in a rural area and get arrested,  it sure could spoil a vacation. 

I have a friend who open carrys  a handgun a lot on his own land, he was open carrying, walking along the state highway that borders his land when a state trooper came driving by and slowed way down like he was going to stop, until my friend got off the right of way onto his own land.   He then drove on.

Last edited on Wed Aug 26th, 2009 03:43 am by junglebob

Sonora Rebel
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Aug 6th, 2008
Location: Picture Rocks, Arizona USA
Posts: 2623
Status:  Offline
ilbob wrote: It could have been a mistake. They might have meant to use the same language but screwed it up.

Or maybe someone thought they could improve upon the language and screwed up.

Its unlikely the legislature ever meant to criminalize some of the behaviors that the wording ended up giving us.

Keep in mind that the original wording of the UUW act did not have the 3 exceptions in it that allow us to legally transport firearms at all. I doub that was intentional either. Just bad law writing.
 


Deliberate obfuscation of legal language and issues appears to be an art form in the Socialist state governments that view the Constitution as an annoyance. What they 'meant' is exactly why you can't bear arms w/o possible consequences.   

halal6
Regular Member


Joined: Sat Aug 1st, 2009
Location: Bellwood, Illinois USA
Posts: 25
Status:  Offline
For those of you that may not know. HB182 has been signed by the Governor and is effective immediatley. You may protect yourself on another persons property if you have their permission. You still have to follow the goofy transport laws to get to that property but its still great that I can visit my friend and bring my gun with me.

 

 

Big Gay Al
Regular Member


Joined: Sun Aug 27th, 2006
Location: Lansing, Michigan USA
Posts: 519
Status:  Offline
I am so NEVER moving back to Illinois.

Sonora Rebel
Regular Member


Joined: Wed Aug 6th, 2008
Location: Picture Rocks, Arizona USA
Posts: 2623
Status:  Offline
Big Gay Al wrote: I am so NEVER moving back to Illinois.


You just echo'd both of my sis-in-laws! :)

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
I was looking at ILCS 5/24-2 and it has fishing and hunting exemptions and says 24-1.6 the Aggravated UUW does not affect any of the following (3) Hunters, trappers, or fisherman with a license or permit while engaged in hunting, trapping, or fishing.

I was thinking I've had a problem this year with varmints killing chickens.  If I got a trapping license I would think I would be able to set traps for them on a neighbors property and then open carry on the road to tend my traps, walking of course.  Lockman, what do you think?

Last edited on Mon Oct 19th, 2009 06:26 pm by junglebob

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
With the trapping license what you described sounds like a legit exemption. If you have the trapping license you better dot all the i’s and cross your t’s when it comes to the wildlife code because now that comes into play.

 

“Engaged in” is also one thing but does it covers to and from such activities. I don’t know, just something to ponder.

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
Lockman, Seems to me if I check a trap on my property and then walked down the road to check one I'd set on a neighbors land I'd be "engaged in checking my traps" , just like I'd be engaged in hunting if I was hunting on my property and then walked across the road to a neighbors property.   They don't expect you to unload and encase your firearm when doing that (well there may be some Illinois cop that does or the ISP) so why should trapping be different.   I'm sure it would be good to have your trapping license/permit on you.

lockman
State Researcher


Joined: Sat Aug 19th, 2006
Location: Elgin, Illinois USA
Posts: 641
Status:  Offline
They don't expect you to unload and encase your firearm when doing that
 

That is exactly what "they" expect. The question: Are you legally required to do so?

I say no, but I am not the one going from trap to trap.

 

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
Why put an exemption in the UUW and agravated UUW for those engaged in hunting, trapping or fishing if this doesn't cover you off your own land on a public road.  You don't need an exemption to carry on your own land and you don't to carry on someone elses, with their permission.  

Rest assured when I open carry while trapping I'll dot all my i's and cross all my t's.   I have a friend who is a conservation officer who mentioned stopping someone who had an unloaded handgun in his vehicle in a Seagram's 7 bag.   He issued no citation, made no arrest, because it was "a container".   I'll get his advice on all the i's that need to be dotted and all the t's that need to be crossed.  He's someone who enforces the law and doesn't try to write it.  He knows about "six seconds from safety" as well, BTW.

Last edited on Wed Oct 21st, 2009 02:04 pm by junglebob

junglebob
Regular Member
 

Joined: Sat Oct 28th, 2006
Location: Southern Illinois, Illinois USA
Posts: 196
Status:  Offline
Deer hunting season is coming up.  Does anyone here open carry a handgun while deer hunting?   There isn't a prohibition because it is a shot gun only season, is there?

ilbob
Activist Member
 

Joined: Tue May 9th, 2006
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 753
Status:  Offline
junglebob wrote: Deer hunting season is coming up.  Does anyone here open carry a handgun while deer hunting?   There isn't a prohibition because it is a shot gun only season, is there?

 google is your friend. :)


http://dnr.state.il.us/admin/pdf/season_dates.pdf


Sidearms and Rifle Regulations


 It is unlawful to:


 have in possession any other firearm when hunting deer with a shotgun, handgun, muzzleloader or bow and arrow. However, more than one firearm may be possessed by a deer hunter provided it is a lawful gun for that particular season.


 possess any rifle in the field during gun deer season except muzzleloading rifles used by deer hunters only. NOTE: The lawful possession of rifles to take furbearing mammals and game mammals other than deer shall not be prohibited during the youth deer hunting season (Oct. 10-11, 2009) muzzleloading rifle-only deer season (Dec.11-13, 2009), and CWD and late-winter antlerless only deer season (Dec. 31, 2009 - Jan. 3, 2010 and Jan. 15-17, 2010).



 

Last edited on Thu Oct 29th, 2009 09:25 pm by ilbob





Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez