|
|
||
| OpenCarry.org - Discussion Forum > Stories From The States > Louisiana > Great Article on the Baillio Incident
|
|||
| Moderated by: jpierce | Topic closed | |
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
smoking357 Banned
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w99.1.html |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
Wow, that's crazy and disgusting. Thanks for posting that. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. And worse yet, it's done with the knowledge and consent of most Louisianians. What further proof is needed we now live in a POLICE STATE? |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. The sadder point, which you referenced, is that most Americans prefer our police state to freedom. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
Oh ya, I've seen lots of things that make you go "what the ****?!, why aren't people getting outraged by this?!" -- not just gun related stuff, but many things. My theory is we're (sadly) living in a society were a lot, not all, but a lot of people just don't care about anything bad happening unless it affects them or someone they know directly. As long as they still have cable TV, food, and a roof over their head they just don't care... At least it seems that way. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
It's not that it SEEMS that way, it IS that way. Case in point: for decades, I've brought matters to the attention of the media, the very people who should be reporting these incidents. 99.99999% of the time, the media ignore them. I usually close our conversations with these words. "When something like this happens to YOU and YOURS, then and only then will it be a headline story, for days." Not sure of your age, but you're miles ahead of the curve compared to the average schmuck over on bayoushooters.com. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
I'm 29. It may sound bad but to a degree I kinda HOPE they keep doing things, violating our rights, and do it in a major way to upset people and cause an uprising (not necessarily violent, unless needed, but at least people getting involved and active and giving a damn). The alternative is they slowly nickel and dime us, chipping away at rights, slowly but surely, and then we turn into another Europe. Makes me think of the whole boiling a frog slowly thing... As for the news, pfft, CLEARLY michael jackson is far more important than anything else going on in the world. Edit: This prolly isn't the forum to start talking about non-firearm related politics, and I can gurantee most people would not agree with my ideas of what needs to be done hehehe. I'm at school now but I'd be interested in talking with you in private messages later. Last edited on Mon Jun 29th, 2009 03:16 pm by Oscarr |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
Oscarr wrote: I'm 29. It may sound bad but to a degree I kinda HOPE they keep doing things, violating our rights, and do it in a major way to upset peopleWon't happen. The show "Cops" is a running call to arms, and people can't get enough of it. This country's Puritanical origins will damn it. Americans hate their neighbors and love to see the government employed to inflict harm on those they hate. This is an anti-freedom place. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
Whether it's OC'ing or whatever, MOST Amerikans seem to attack anyone exercising ANY right which may be unorthodox/uncommon. I guess when someone DOES such, it shows up the rest of them for what they are: cowards. And THAT is why they attack others for simply exercising a right. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
Ya but that just goes back to my point of, if it doesn't affect them DIRECTLY, they don't care. When I say "a major way" I mean things like out right banning ownership of all firearms, period. Of course, even then there may not be enough people that care, I'd have expected people to be vehemently against state-run health care, and wide scale amnesty for illegals, etc etc... yet here we go... Edit: This reply was for smoking357 Edit 2: Geez I gotta get back to class lol. Leaving early today too, gotta go and try to find some ammo for my .44 magnum, weeeee. Last edited on Mon Jun 29th, 2009 03:37 pm by Oscarr |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
Most historians claim the American revolution was fought by 3% of the population. Expecting a majority is not necessary. |
|||||||||
|
XD-GEM Activist Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: It's not that it SEEMS that way, it IS that way. Sadly, Mark is correct about this - and it occurs with other subject areas as well, not just gun rights. With the advertising incoming drop due to the current recession, this may even get worse as newsroom budgets and staff sizes shrink as a result. The only stories that get covered will be the easy ones or the ones that have the kind of mass appeal that Jackson's death generates. We've seen this very thing happen with some news organizations blandly parroting the information they are sent in news releases without bothering to check their facts (which is supposed to be journalism 101). |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
Knowing what XD GEM just stated, I went the extra mile with some media outlets. I offered to have PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS prepare news stories/articles in whatever format they desired, I'd even personally sell ads to help cover the expense of running a story. No deal. They're not interested in the truth no more than the folks on bayoushooters are. It would conflict with their perception of reality. |
|||||||||
|
XD-GEM Activist Member
|
I once pitched a story idea to a friend of mine who is a TV sports producer. I told him about the Cowboy Action shooting matches in Folsom. He was intrigued and wanted to do the story. I thought it was good from the standpoint that it would show gun owners doing something fun and family-oriented and would provide some interesting video opportunities. When he pitched the idea to his superiors, they squashed it because it would tie up a crew for too long to do the story. (HUGE SIGH) Last edited on Mon Jun 29th, 2009 07:01 pm by XD-GEM |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: It's not that it SEEMS that way, it IS that way. Now mem, what did this thread have to do with BayouShooter. ARe you so upset that there is such a large community of people who do not by your rhetoric, that you must take every conceivable attempt to defame them? Thanks for the ad though. |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
Oscarr wrote: Ya but that just goes back to my point of, if it doesn't affect them DIRECTLY, they don't care. When I say "a major way" I mean things like out right banning ownership of all firearms, period. Of course, even then there may not be enough people that care, I'd have expected people to be vehemently against state-run health care, and wide scale amnesty for illegals, etc etc... yet here we go... I agree hat most of society is so self-centric that if it does not have an impact, a significant impact , on their daily lives, then it does not register. You hit the proverbial nail on the head. |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: Knowing what XD GEM just stated, I went the extra mile with some media outlets. Again, who other than you brought up BayouShooters.com in this thread. |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
I really don't understand why Mark brings out so much anti-Americanism. Mark advocates the pure classical Liberal ideology of limited government and maximum Liberty. When did such ideas become distasteful? You people need to take the quiz and be honest about what you are: http://www.politicalcompass.org My results: Last edited on Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:11 am by smoking357 |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. we have always lived in a police state with out it you are living in anarchy. |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: Most historians claim the American revolution was fought by 3% of the population. I can not find this fact pleas show us where this came from besides your ass |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
jimmyb wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:Most historians claim the American revolution was fought by 3% of the population. I'd imagine the answer came from his fingers as he typed it, unless he typed it with his ass, in which case that's pretty impressive. (See, I can be a sarcastic smartalec too!) As for facts: According to this: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/001798.html the population was 2,500,000 According to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War we had 20,000 regulars and 230,000 militia for a total of 250,000 250,000 of 2,500,000 is 10% Of course this is wikipedia, and mark may be getting his numbers from another source, either way, it's still a small percent. Last edited on Tue Jun 30th, 2009 12:45 am by Oscarr |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
jimmyb wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. Is that so? How many people do the police murder, beat, rape, torture and extort in an anarchy? Since anarchy implies an absence of government, and since police are governmental actors, the answer would be 'zero.' Downside? |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
The problem is most people use the word "anarchy" to mean rampant chaos. Kinda like the word "assault weapon", it's used to invoke fear. I'm more for a pure democracy, we have the technology these days to make it viable. Just need a populace that is interested in voting and caring about what's going on. |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
smoking357 wrote: jimmyb wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. I am truly sorry to hear that the Police beat and raped you. Jist how big was the billy club that was used. Other than you I have never meet one. As for me when the police tell me to stop or laydown or hop on one foot that is what I am doing to not get beat tazed or maced. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
jimmyb wrote:
So you'll do what the police tell you to, no matter what it is? (Is that what you're implying, with the hop on one foot thing?) Just looking to clarify. |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
Oscarr wrote: jimmyb wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:Most historians claim the American revolution was fought by 3% of the population. I think he uses his ass to think with allso |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
Oscarr wrote: jimmyb wrote:to not get beat tazed or mased at 6 foot something and 300 and something pounds I kinda make some people neversice( and I cant spell) |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
jimmyb wrote: smoking357 wrote:jimmyb wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. Another gun owner far to the Left of Obama. We all need to obey orders of armed governmental agents, FOR FREEDOM! This Independence Day, be a real American, and celebrate your obedience to the government. ![]() Last edited on Tue Jun 30th, 2009 02:16 am by smoking357 |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
smoking357 wrote: jimmyb wrote:smoking357 wrote:jimmyb wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:The truly sad aspect of this is it's not an isolated situation, but a widespread pattern of how "they" think and act. so you was raped by the Police. why dont you and mark take your guns pick a Police Station (any one will work) Stand outside and haller F you to them and shoot your guns in the air. Call the news before you go so thay can get it all on tape. The world would be a better Place after yall show the Police State we live in. TAKE ONE FOR THE TEAM. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
Hi jimmyb, I notice you're 'new' to the forums, I'm new too! So far every post you've made has been in the negative light. Do you have a stance on openly carrying? |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
I am all for ocing I just think after reading a lot of stuff on here Frick (MEM) and frack(SMOKING GOOD STUFF) make all of the rest us look bad because thay want to be a bunch of retards.( in my option) |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
jimmyb wrote: I am all for ocing I just think after reading a lot of stuff on here Frick (MEM) and frack(SMOKING GOOD STUFF) make all of the rest us look bad because thay want to be a bunch of retards.( in my option) Ah, "Retard," that third-grade epithet hurled at one who writes in clear and concise composition by one who struggles to evidence completion of that pedagogical strata so referenced. Stinging invective, that. Boys, if anything puts "us" in a negative light, it's the anti-intellectual, anti-freedom, hateful, violent, belligerent, jingoistic, uncultured, Country Music, pickup truck, pro-cop, pro-military worldview evidenced by so many Southern and rural posters here that is so noxious to most of America and almost all the world. Of the two of us, only one stands a chance of being offered a friend's spare tickets to the Chopin recital. Further, only one of us would have a friend with Chopin tickets. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
At least it's getting more attention: http://www.dixienet.org/rebellion/2009/06/totalitarianism-in-one-city-shreveports.html Edit: And for those that want the full transcript of the call, here's the audio recording with text - http://www.conservativedrink.com/media/GloverInterview-060809-Video.asp Last edited on Tue Jun 30th, 2009 11:10 pm by Oscarr |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
smoking357 wrote: jimmyb wrote:Did anybody understand the babble of the mentally chalenged something about it being wrong to be southern rural drive a truck bla bla. He still hasnt denied being raped by the cops with a night stick.I am all for ocing I just think after reading a lot of stuff on here Frick (MEM) and frack(SMOKING GOOD STUFF) make all of the rest us look bad because thay want to be a bunch of retards.( in my option) |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
smoking357 wrote: jimmyb wrote:I am all for ocing I just think after reading a lot of stuff on here Frick (MEM) and frack(SMOKING GOOD STUFF) make all of the rest us look bad because thay want to be a bunch of retards.( in my option) WOW. So all those people, who listen to country music, support their military, follow the laws, and drive a truck, are anti-American? If anyone had any doubts to your lack of sound mental facilities, I am sure you just cleared that up. You sir, are a true Amerikkkan. Way to go. |
|||||||||
|
derf Regular Member
|
It is sad if you need an internet quiz to tell you who you are and/or where you stand. Please post pics of you OCing at the Chopin recital. This is all about OC and you are a die hard OCer, right? How does the holster look with symphony attire? I guess you have to carry a Glock if it is black tie or tails. Or, would something chrome accent your cufflinks? |
|||||||||
|
IA-Pro Regular Member
|
smoking357 wrote: Boys, if anything puts "us" in a negative light, it's the anti-intellectual, anti-freedom, hateful, violent, belligerent, jingoistic, uncultured, Country Music, pickup truck, pro-cop, pro-military worldview evidenced by so many Southern and rural posters here that is so noxious to most of America and almost all the world. I'm only maybe half these things. I'm jingoistic, uncultured, a Country Music fan, a pickup truck driver, and have a pro-military worldview. Where does that put me? ![]() |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
Well, pro-military puts you directly opposite a society based on real freedom and respect for the liberties of persons here and abroad. Really don't understand how country music comes into this discussion, though. |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: Well, pro-military puts you directly opposite a society based on real freedom and respect for the liberties of persons here and abroad. Sorry, those comments were from the mouth of your protegee' smokingcrack24/7 |
|||||||||
|
IA-Pro Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: Well, pro-military puts you directly opposite a society based on real freedom and respect for the liberties of persons here and abroad. IMHO, my pro-military stance puts me IN LINE with a society based on real freedom and liberty. It's how that military is used that may be in question here. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
So, out of curiosity, any chance of getting this thread back on topic? As in, how do you feel about the shreveport mayor's stance? What can/should we do about it? I encourage you if you get time to listen to the recording of the phone call. |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
IA-Pro wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:Well, pro-military puts you directly opposite a society based on real freedom and respect for the liberties of persons here and abroad. Actually, no. Pro-military is a very Leftist idea. |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote:
We're discussing what terrifies the big cities. |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
Oscarr wrote: So, out of curiosity, any chance of getting this thread back on topic? As in, how do you feel about the shreveport mayor's stance? What can/should we do about it? You mistakenly assume there is a "we" here. Not everyone on this board is on the same team. A great many agree with the Mayor and would, if allowed, beat you into oblivion for thinking otherwise. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
I do have to ask though, how is pro-military a leftist idea? Every liberal I know is anti-military and think any situation can be talked out. I'm pro-DEFENSIVE-military/militia. People that train with modern technologies to defend us if we're ever under attack. But I'm against using our military to advance the agenda of whoever happens to be in charge at the time in foreign countries. Let's mind our own business unless they come to us ASKING for help first, then let the people vote if they want to help. But seriously, I don't have a clue about how to fly a stealth fighter, how to build precision guided bombs, missile detection/defense networks, etc etc - we need people that do and are, to be able to defend our country from attacks by other countries. If all we had was everyone walking around with handguns (which would be damn sweet), that's not gonna do much when China or whoever decides to nuke us. Last edited on Wed Jul 1st, 2009 08:11 pm by Oscarr |
|||||||||
|
Jerry McBride Founder's Club Member
|
Oscarr wrote: So, out of curiosity, any chance of getting this thread back on topic? As in, how do you feel about the shreveport mayor's stance? What can/should we do about it? Mayor had it right, show your papers at a traffic stop. Most everything else was wrong, including speeches to the grads. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
Jerry McBride wrote: Oscarr wrote:So, out of curiosity, any chance of getting this thread back on topic? As in, how do you feel about the shreveport mayor's stance? What can/should we do about it? Yup, you have to show your papers - but the guy that was stopped was never even asked to show ID/insurance/registration, he was OUTSIDE of his vehicle, the cop asked him if he had a gun, he said yes, the cop went over to his unoccupied vehicle, opened the door, and took the gun out. Is that legal? As for the mayor, saying that cops have more power than the president of the united states... yeesh, that's pretty out there to me. |
|||||||||
|
Jerry McBride Founder's Club Member
|
Maybe this was a recent graduate of the academy and he wants' to be Mayor someday. |
|||||||||
|
IA-Pro Regular Member
|
smoking357 wrote: IA-Pro wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:Well, pro-military puts you directly opposite a society based on real freedom and respect for the liberties of persons here and abroad. Can't... go... on... Has anyone thought of posting a glossary of OC and other terms used here? Me thinks my definition of pro-military is different than theirs. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
IA-Pro, go up about 4 posts and read my post on military, I'd like to hear your thoughts please. |
|||||||||
|
Jerry McBride Founder's Club Member
|
nolacopusmc wrote: smoking357 wrote:jimmyb wrote:I am all for ocing I just think after reading a lot of stuff on here Frick (MEM) and frack(SMOKING GOOD STUFF) make all of the rest us look bad because thay want to be a bunch of retards.( in my option) Oscarr I re-read the thread and my opinion is I'm not going to make it much longer. The oldest daughter totaled my Dodge Ram while listening to country music. My youngest daughter is a cop and my wife and I are both former military. I'm a southerner who has no friends that will use chopsticks. Oh, and XD-GEM -------- |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
Jerry McBride wrote:Heheheh I hear ya |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
nolacopusmc wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:Well, pro-military puts you directly opposite a society based on real freedom and respect for the liberties of persons here and abroad. psssst there the same person |
|||||||||
|
derf Regular Member
|
My $0.02 on the topic: It is my understanding that if you are stopped for a traffic violation you are technically under arrest. The summons (ticket) is issued in lieu of a trip to jail and you are released. The mayor may misunderstand this to read "your rights are suspended". They are not. But, while under arrest a LEO has the right to disarm you. |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
derf wrote: My $0.02 on the topic: That is exactly correct.The only traffic violation that is not jailable is no seatbelt. Stop sign, redlight, expired MVI, TECHNICALLY you could go to jail. Almost never happens unless the violator is a total dick. Up to officer discretion. Some jurisdictions have a policy about what rides and what does not. Depends on local jail occupancy. I know where I work, traffic alone does not go to jail. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
There you have it, an OFFICIAL admission if a "law enforcement officer" doesn't like you, you go to jail. It has NOTHING to do with the rule of law, it's how "they" operate. Didn't someone in an earlier thread try to explain an OC'ers attitude was a basis/justification for being jerked around? |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: There you have it, an OFFICIAL admission if a "law enforcement officer" doesn't like you, you go to jail. It has NOTHING to do with the rule of law, it's how "they" operate. |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
jimmyb wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:There you have it, an OFFICIAL admission if a "law enforcement officer" doesn't like you, you go to jail. It has NOTHING to do with the rule of law, it's how "they" operate. LOL. i like his Sweeney persona better too. A least as Sweeny, he completely makes stuff up instead of trying to twist words. he is a funny little man. Funny, funny little man,. |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
nolacopusmc wrote: jimmyb wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:There you have it, an OFFICIAL admission if a "law enforcement officer" doesn't like you, you go to jail. It has NOTHING to do with the rule of law, it's how "they" operate. I dont understand how someone can be so closed minded. MEM wake up and smell the coffee man do you really want to go back to the old west and I am not talking about carrying I am talking about lawness. Society without law is nothing. |
|||||||||
|
IA-Pro Regular Member
|
Am I missing something here? Why the hell would we have laws that for "stop sign, redlight, expired MVI, TECHNICALLY you could go to jail.". After looking at some state laws, this doesn't seem to be the case. I reviewed RS 32:123 & 32:1301. Can local government jail you for these types of "offenses"? And if so, what the hell sense does that make? Oh, and p.s. If I'm technically under arrest during a traffic stop where a ticket is issued, I'd like to have the miranda warning read to me. Since it's not, I don't think I'm under arrest. I think this is total b.s. Last edited on Thu Jul 2nd, 2009 03:39 pm by IA-Pro |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
LOL, now HERE's something I have tremendous firsthand experience with. When I sued DMV for a driver's license with NO social security number, the nazi cops came out of the woodwork. They would literally wait for me to leave the house so they could give me ANOTHER ticket for expired driver's license. After finally tromping DMV in court, I got a letter to come get my license, which I did. They STILL refused to obey the court's decision. Instead, that very afternoon, on a Friday,not one, not two, not three, but FOUR Baton Rouge city cops, ALL from third district only, ambushed me on my drive home. The ONLY reason I didn't spend the entire weekend in parish prison was because it was full !!!! They DID take my truck, though. Yep, there are LOTS of "law enforcement officers" who lust for power, LOVE to bully others with it. Sound like anyone on THIS board? |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
IA-Pro wrote: Am I missing something here? Why the hell would we have laws that for "stop sign, redlight, expired MVI, TECHNICALLY you could go to jail.". irst of all, you can be arrested for any offense not expemted by law. Secondly, Miranda only applies if you are asked questions that ar intended to be used in court. I have arrested many people for drug possession and never read then Miranda, testified in court that I never read them Miranda, and they got time. i never read them Miranda, because I never asked them any questions. had I not read them Miranda, asked them questio n, then thse answers would not have been admissable in court. many people who watch too much CSI or law and order think everyone arrested must be read Miranda...not the case. Miranda is simply designed to advise the suspect of their 5th ammendment right to self incrimination. no questions, equals no incrimination. the place I worked before my current one allowed arrests for any offense arrestable. many people went to jail for speeding, suspended DL, etc. The ticket is an option. granted, there are much more vile people that the jail space is used for, hence the reason while I typed in big bold letters, TECHNICALLY. Meaning, it could happen, but probably will not. |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: LOL, now HERE's something I have tremendous firsthand experience with. man, so all of these officers had nothing better to do than to pick on poor memmy? I mean really, your dillusion have already proven themselves. SO praytell, what was your logic for not wanting SSN on your DL? Or was that just the current way for you to get money at the time to spend on crossdraw holsters instead of your sick wives medical needs? |
|||||||||
|
derf Regular Member
|
LOL, now HERE's something I have tremendous firsthand experience with. When I sued DMV for a driver's license with NO social security number, I appreciate that. Thank you. You and I agree on that: We don't need our SSNs on our DLs. I am not sure of your motives, but I like not having my SSN on my DL. I also like not having my fingerprint on my DL. the nazi cops came out of the woodwork. They would literally wait for me to leave the house so they could give me ANOTHER ticket for expired driver's license. After finally tromping DMV in court, I got a letter to come get my license, which I did. They STILL refused to obey the court's decision. Instead, that very afternoon, on a Friday,not one, not two, not three, but FOUR Baton Rouge city cops, ALL from third district only, ambushed me on my drive home. The ONLY reason I didn't spend the entire weekend in parish prison was because it was full !!!! They DID take my truck, though. Yep, there are LOTS of "law enforcement officers" who lust for power, LOVE to bully others with it. Sound like anyone on THIS board? Cops are people. There are good people and bad people. There are good cops and bad cops. I don't know nolacop. But, my opinion is that if he or any other LEO was here with an anti-OC agenda they would be doing more to "fit in" and gain confidences. And, cops do target known offenders. You will know when you meet a real dirty cop. They don't play games. They will find that packet of meth you didn't know you had and charge you with intent to distribute. I'm just sayin.... |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
derf wrote: LOL,LOL, now HERE's something I have tremendous firsthand experience with. When I sued DMV for a driver's license with NO social security number, Thanks a lot. Now his alter ego Sweeney will say I planted rugs on him. WTG. |
|||||||||
|
derf Regular Member
|
nolacopusmc wrote: derf wrote:LOL,LOL, now HERE's something I have tremendous firsthand experience with. When I sued DMV for a driver's license with NO social security number, Well, I didn't say anyone would get shot "resisting" and have their OC weapon placed in their hand. I'm just sayin that if the cops are really out to get you there are some that will. Is he from India? Why are you planting "rugs" on him? |
|||||||||
|
Dustin Regular Member
|
derf wrote: Is he from India? Why are you planting "rugs" on him? LOL ! There's a good quote |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
I don't have my SSN on my license either, but there was no hassle about it. It was as easy as telling the lady behind the counter at the dmv "don't print my SSN on there please". My reasoning: If I lose my wallet that's one less piece of personal info someone WONT have access to use in identity theft. Also going back to the original topic: I understand if you're in your vehicle when you get stopped, you can be disarmed for safety. But in THIS incident, the guy was OUTSIDE of his vehicle, and the cop went over to his vehicle, opened the door (without permission), and took the gun. Wouldn't this fall under illegal search and seizure? |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
Oscarr, The reason it was no big deal was because I paved the way for you and everyone else. AFTER I forced DMV to obey the law, both state and federal law changed, basically making it a moot point. |
|||||||||
|
Oscarr Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: Oscarr,As so this wasn't a recent incident then? |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: LOL, now HERE's something I have tremendous firsthand experience with. How many of them gave you hassle about open carry at that time. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
Oscarr, back in 1996........... the then-deputy director of DMV was a REAL nazi, trust me, he was a neighbor of mine, Bobby Breland. There's a special place in hell for people like him. |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
there is a special place for you in Jackson or Mandivill |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: Oscarr, All hair the attention whore. Thank you for your selfless sacrifice and making sure we are all aware of it. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
* |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: * Is the * a mem thing? WHat does it mean? |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
* |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: *Wow, your a wealth of information. Log in as Sweeny and toss some knowledge my way. |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: * that is deep |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
jimmyb wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:* i have a funny feeling that is a symbol for the part of the body that he most often speaks from, you know, opposite his mouth. |
|||||||||
|
mark edward marchiafava Regular Member
|
* |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
nolacopusmc wrote: jimmyb wrote:mark edward marchiafava wrote:* that is what I was thinking too |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: * he types with such grace |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
mark edward marchiafava wrote: * * |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
nolacopusmc wrote: mark edward marchiafava wrote:* I think I have this figued out He is calling you a STAR. he loves you that is what it is |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
derf wrote:
It's for us to determine where you stand, coward. What's the matter, Commie? Did you take the quiz and learn that your plot is superimposed over Hitler's? Show us your results, Adolf. Quit being chicken. Bwaaak, bwaaak, bwaaak. Last edited on Fri Jul 3rd, 2009 11:10 pm by smoking357 |
|||||||||
|
nolacopusmc Banned
|
smoking357 wrote: derf wrote: PERSONAL ATTACK |
|||||||||
|
smoking357 Banned
|
nolacopusmc wrote: smoking357 wrote:derf wrote: Get ready for more, white trash. And just what are you going to do about it, Nazi? Huh, wimp? |
|||||||||
|
jimmyb Regular Member
|
smoking357 wrote: nolacopusmc wrote:smoking357 wrote:derf wrote: Is it jist me or does it seem that he has mutable personalty's |
|||||||||